Educational FYI's
Educational FYI's are written on topics that effect various aspects of estate planning and the laws that govern it. They are published and posted to this site when news worthy events happen that we feel you should be made aware of. The purpose of an Estate Planning Update is to bring important information to the financial advisors in the community. Our hope is that this information better equips you to assist your clients.
REGISTER TO VIEW FYIs ARCHIVE
The Mendel Law Firm, L.P. releases important estate planning and related articles when there are changes in the law that we feel have an especially large impact. Please take a moment to register to receive full access to our Educational FYIs.
Power of Attorney, Lacking Gift-Giving Authority, Does Not Authorize Gifts to Agent
Mother, suffering from mild dementia, executed a general power of attorney in favor of her son--the power of attorney did not include any language specifically authorizing gifts. Shortly thereafter she moved in and lived with him, and after about eight months moved to a nursing home. At the time of her move to the nursing home the son, using his power of attorney, transferred all her real property, stocks and other assets to himself. The mother died a little over a year later, leaving a will that devised all her assets equally to her son and daughter. After securing appointment as executor of the estate, daughter filed suit to recover the remaining assets, arguing that the purpose of the original conveyance was solely to protect the assets from being depleted by nursing home expenses and that with the mother's death they should be re-conveyed to her estate. Trial court ordered reconveyance and on appealed. Intermediate state appellate court affirms, noting that without a specific gift-giving provision in the power of attorney, a gift to the agent "carries with it a presumption of impropriety and self-dealing." In order to overcome that presumption, the recipient of the gift must make "the clearest showing of intent" on the part of the principal; evidence that the mother in this case trusted her son more, wanted him to manage her money, and may even have been fearful of her daughter did not meet that high standard of evidence.
The plaintiff, who had been seeking to provide cash for his daughter to pay anticipated estate taxes, established an irrevocable life insurance trust in 1991 and paid $300,000 in premiums for a $4.2 million second-to-die policy. The insurance agent's projections, assuming a 10% return, showed no further premium payments would be required. The ILIT Trustee, a CPA, sought independent advice which indicated that the initial premium payment would need to earn a 24% return for 28 years to cover all premiums, but the settlor instructed him to follow the insurance agent's direction.
Testamentary Effect of Trust Provision Requires Compliance With Will Formalities - Arnold v. Davis
A decedent (the widow of country music recording artist Jim Reeves) had established a trust to hold her considerable assets, though her capacity to sign or approve of a trust was later called into question. When she died while conservatorship proceedings were pending, the court granted an interpleader request and ordered that all her trust assets and all income from sale of her late husband's music and real estate holdings be paid to an administrator while the validity of the trust was resolved.A victim that was vulnerable to exploitation made a videotaped statement to police officers two days before she died and a statement to a social work supervisor shortly before her death.
As the testatrix lay dying in a hospital bed, a lawyer relative contacted a long-time associate and asked him to visit her at the hospital to help her prepare a will. The relative also provided the lawyer with details about the testatrix' estate plan, including her intention to leave him (the lawyer relative) a significant bequest. The drafting lawyer, the lawyer relative and the testatrix all met together at the hospital, and the drafting lawyer prepared a will and supervised its execution. After the testatrix' death a will contest was filed, with the result that $620,000 was made unavailable to the residual beneficiaries (the opinion does not relate the particulars of the will contest or the identity of any contestant, or indicate how much of the $620,000 was attorney's fees incurred in defense of the will and how much a payment to contestants).
SHARE
PRINT